My thread about the yearn affiliate jars got some traction and I’m now requesting further comment before we take this to the next step which would be a snapshot vote.
There’s been some further discussion on how to handle this. I’d like to get consensus on what the fee (if any) should be before we take it to snapshot (that way we’d have a binary snapshot vote).
We could extend this further to any low yield no IL steth, wbtc, stables, etc. jars so we can offer a wide range of products while making it at the same time attractive to the protocol.
Since these low yield but native jars are different to wrapped yearn vaults, we should consider different (lower) deposit and/or withdrawal fees.
Then there are the IL farms (yvboost/eth, alcx/eth, cvx/eth ect) which don’t need an overhaul to the fee structure in my opinion.
In short, a comment by Wunderbernd in DILLDAO sums it up nicely: “I just like to structure it, group yearn wrapper jars, group single based farms (stETH, renBTC etc.), group normal LP farms.”
- 1% deposit/withdrawal fees for yearn wrapped vaults
- 0.5% deposit/withdrawal fees for native low yield no IL farms ie: stEthCrv, p3CRV
- 0% deposit/withdrawal fees for mid to high yield IL farms ie: alcx/eth, yvboost/eth
This could also set the fee structure for jars to come in the future, it’s quite clear in my opinion where future jars will fall into as the categories are distinct enough.
- Proceed to proposal
- Do nothing